Argentina’s reserves, held by its Central Bank, include almost two million troy ounces of gold, valued at about $4.5 billion. But lately, there’s a question that’s on everybody’s lips: where is it? Was it taken out of the country? Did some of it remain within Argentina, while the rest was transferred abroad? Well, the official information only offers partial answers. Argentina is facing a situation where its national reserve of gold is raising concerns and sparking speculation.
Background of Gold Transfer
The administration of far-right President Javier Milei admitted to the recent transfer of gold abroad, but didn’t specify quantities, the destination, or the purpose for this measure. Nor did the Central Bank provide any details. In a scenario of financial instability — and with the government facing the need to accumulate reserves — the decision generated suspicions and speculation. There are also fears that the gold could possibly be seized, due to long-standing legal cases that have been filed against Argentina by foreign creditors. This transfer has raised eyebrows due to the lack of transparency surrounding its details.
The news about the transfer of the gold was not officially announced by the government or the Central Bank. Rather, the information came from the bank workers’ union, known as La Bancaria. Its leader, the left-wing legislator Sergio Palazzo, presented a request within the framework of the Law of Access to Public Information for the Central Bank of the Argentine Republic (BCRA), asking about operations to send gold bars abroad during the month of June. The lack of official communication regarding this transfer has led to skepticism and criticism.
Last Friday, Minister of Economy Luis Caputo acknowledged that the operation was carried out. He argued that having gold outside the country allows for potential returns and benefits compared to keeping it inside the country where it serves no purpose. The purpose of the transfer was hinted at being for depositing the gold abroad to earn interest. However, there are concerns raised by economists about the justification of this operation given the low returns and additional costs involved.
Insight into Government’s Strategy
President Milei hinted that the transfer of gold abroad is related to the possibility of using it as collateral to take out a bridge loan, which would help in paying off foreign debts and improving access to credit in financial markets. This strategy is aimed at instilling confidence and reducing the country’s financial risk profile. It shows that Argentina is leveraging its gold reserves to navigate its economic challenges, but the potential risks involved are subject to criticism and scrutiny.
Criticism and Potential Risks
Criticism has been raised by the opposition and economists regarding the lack of transparency and potential risks associated with transferring the gold abroad. Concerns about the operation being used as collateral for loans and the susceptibility to asset freezes have been highlighted. The transfer of gold puts Argentina’s national reserves at risk of foreign judicial interference, similar to previous cases with other countries like Venezuela and their gold reserves.
The stance of political opposition and economic experts reflects the uncertainty and risks involved in using gold reserves in financial maneuvers. While some see it as a common practice to leverage gold reserves for liquidity, others warn about the possible negative consequences if the assets are frozen or seized during transit. The decision to transfer gold abroad for financial purposes must be carefully weighed against the potential risks it poses to the country’s economic stability.
Potential Sanctions and Asset Freezing
The risk of foreign judiciaries targeting Argentina’s national reserves due to outstanding legal disputes with international creditors is a significant concern. The history of legal disputes and asset freezes faced by Argentina underscores the vulnerability of its reserves to external interference. Economists and experts emphasize the need to safeguard the central bank’s autonomy to protect the country’s assets from potential sanctions and asset freezes.
The transfer of gold abroad raises questions about the government’s strategic motives and the implications of using precious assets as collateral. The potential risks of asset freezes and the long-standing legal battles highlight the delicate balance between leveraging reserves for financial stability and safeguarding against external threats.
Translated by Avik Jain Chatlani.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
